Monday, May 30, 2011



Area 51 Uncensored Ufos Or Ussr Trick
Terri Opposed (NPR, Naive Air, WHYY, May 17, 2011)U.S. Effortless Comment "Command 51" from beyond in 1968

* Chill


[The cover up continues by a new and scandalous twist: Russian inherited anomalies in a UFO-like spy plane were crashed in the US to muddle up Americans.]

Seventy-five miles north of Las Vegas sits a land parcel in the nucleus of the put off. Called Command 51, the parcel is innocently unconnected of the solitary Nevada Nightmare and Education Put out, someplace more than 100 atmospheric demolish tests were conducted in the 1950s.

Properly, the U.S. government has never much-admired the existence of Command 51. As you think fit, it has stab a repair allied by conspiracy theories, alien landings and insufficiently spaceships.

Anchor Annie Jacobsen tells "Naive Air"'s Terry Opposed that the site has remained classified for mass years -- not seeing that of aliens or spaceships, but seeing that the government following recycled the site for top-secret nuclear examination and weapons growth.

In "Command 51: An Independent Note of America's Top Recipe Military Seat", Jacobsen details how many agencies -- plus the Infinitesimal Vitality Rationale, the Field of Shield and the CIA -- following recycled the site to select doubtful and completion research on aircraft and pilot-related projects, plus planes that traveled three period faster than the lack of warmth of superior and nuclear-propelled, space-based case arise systems. "Command 51: An Independent Note, "Annie JacobsenREAD AN Give a price of

In a row PLUMBBOBIn the summer and fall of 1957, a series of atmospheric nuclear tests -- called In a row Plumbbob -- were conducted beyond ground at the Nevada examination and try degree, positioned innocently unconnected of Command 51.

Twenty-nine explosions were set off even if tests were conducted on celebration keenness, unintended detonations and the effects of flying vandalize on being targets, according to documents declassified by the Field of Vitality that Jacobsen details in her book.

In the sphere of the explosions, assure formal Richard Mingus stood attend to unconnected mass of the weapons-testing sites, plus one by the prime atmospheric demolish that has regularly exploded in the Common States. Better-quality



Neurologica Blog Bugged By Ufos
"From http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php By Steven Novella" UK "UFO" enthusiasts lately called a recover to discourse the on purpose of the "UFO" tread, that is whether or not present-day is goodbye to be one. Come out of groups... "Original at http://theness.com"Joined * NeuroLogica Blog >> Bugged by UFOS * UFO Witness Says, Advanced UFOS Thought After Dec 21, 2012, Information... * Denver UFOs Mystify Seal Media And Aviation Usefulness Steve Cowell (Capture on film) - Huffington Soft surface * UFO: Cigar-like craft hovers over Philadelphia - Investigator.comAMAZON Reduce12 Short Stories (Waken Come forth 12 Short Stories (Waken Come forth)By George R. Khouri Buy new: 3.99 Firstly tagged "ufo" by GRK "GRK" Addict tags: short stories, space exploration, destruction, aliens, space adventure, on purpose, spaceflight, invasion, science invention, hypocritical intelligence, asteroid, daydream12 Short Stories (Manuscript) Newl 12 Short Stories (Manuscript)By George R. Khouri Buy new: 7.99 Firstly tagged "ufo" by GRK "GRK" Addict tags: short stories, space exploration, destruction, aliens, space adventure, on purpose, spaceflight, invasion, science invention, hypocritical intelligence, asteroid, daydreamThe Holidaymaker (Waken Come forth) Newl The Holidaymaker (Waken Come forth)By Earth Zigler Buy new: 4.99 Firstly tagged "ufo" by Earth Zigler "Dudley" Addict tags: aliens(2), alien abduction, ufo, abduction, horridness, science inventionTerrifying Tales Of The Paranorma Terrifying Tales Of The Sinister (Waken Come forth)By Denver Hensley Buy new: 2.99 Addict Rating: Firstly tagged "ufo" by Doug Addict tags: alien creatures(2), paranormal album, books for tweens, paranormal, new releases, ethereal houses, ouija buff, bestseller, boo, daydream books, books for teens, mischievous spirit story



Real Ufo Crashes
SHORT UFO FACT: [MASSACHUSETTS CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF AERIAL PHENOMENA is a loose-knit organization comprised of researchers who wish to remain unaffiliated with any specific UFO group and concentrate efforts in individual fields of interest; many members do belong to other UFO groups, such as CAUS, MUFON, CUFOS, etc. Organization address: 43 Harrison Street Reading, Massachusetts 01867 Contact Jim Melesciuc 617-944 0686 ]

UFO GRAZING WTC BUILDING


SHORT UFO FACT: [MEN IN BLACK. Beginning in the late 1950s, reports surfaced of strange men arriving, unannounced, sometimes alone, sometimes in twos or in threes, at the homes of particular UFO witnesses usually before they had reported their sightings to anyone. Often seeming to know more than a stranger should know about the witnesses, MIB caution against reporting their sightings or close encounters. MIB typically walk with a strange limp, speak in mechanical monotones or annoying sing-songs, wear black suits and black shoes, often arrive driving black cars, and convey an overall eerie '"otherworldly"' aura.]

UFO HUNTERS EPISODE S02E03 HEARTLAND EXPLOSION 15


IF THESE EVIDENCES ARE ENOUGH FOR YOU, THEN RATE THIS PAGE:

>>> You're still not sure? Get the documentary proof here

Origin: lights-in-sky.blogspot.com

Friday, May 27, 2011



Does The Loch Ness Monster Really Exist
Nessie - Real or Not?

By TCC Team Member Dorraine Fisher. Professional Writer, a nature and wildlife enthusiast who has written for many magazines.

DOES THE LOCH NESS MONSTER REALLY EXIST?Extreme Monster Hunter, Adam Davies, Weighs InBy TCC Team Member Dorraine Fisher

Most of us in the bigfoot world believe in the creature because there's enough evidence floating around out there to give us good reasons. Hundreds of researchers around North America and around the world are collecting evidence nearly every day, listening to hundreds of stories and filing reports. It's enough of a constant cycle of sightings and reports to at least give all of us reason to believe we need to examine the subject further.

Bigfoot gets a lot of attention because he's earned it. He keeps popping up in lots of places around the world and holding everyone's interest. But when you look at Facebook pages and websites dedicated to The Loch Ness Monster, there doesn't seem to be so much activity; one recent report and photo among a few other scattered sightings over the course of time. No volume even close to the number of bigfoot and yeti reports around the world.

So does The Loch Ness Monster, aka Nessie in Scotland warrant the same attention and emotional investment from researchers and locals there? Does it really exist? I just had to ask our favorite cryptid hunter, Adam Davies, the guy who's actually been there and done the work to look for Nessie and worked with National Geographic, Monster Quest, and Finding Bigfoot, what his thoughts are on the subject. He knows lake monsters exist. He's actually seen one. And even though it's a really hard thing in the cryptid world for a cryptid researcher to say he doesn't think a certain cryptid exists, Adam seemed pretty comfortable saying it's his opinion that Nessie doesn't exist, and he explains why:

"I know Lake Monsters exist.

Importantly, so do credible scientists.

In 1999, I was part of a team which used a hydrophone to prove the existence of Selma, the Norwegian version of Nessie.

You could clearly hear the animals seemingly communicating with one another. So convincing was it that it led the Marine Research Institute in Bergen to conclude we had found an unknown species. Importantly, I also saw it.

In Loch Ness a year later, I tried the same approach with the hydrophone. Simply put, apart from fish, there was nothing very interesting registering on our hydrophone.

What could it be in the Lake then? Well, to dismiss all the accounts as floating logs, wakes or just lies was incorrect in my opinion. I remember seeing a particularly persuasive account by a Monk who had certainly seen an animal in the water. He described its specific movement through the water. He had certainly seen an animal.

What could it be then? Fishermen at Foyers told me they had seen huge eels in the Loch. Large eels would explain the SHAPE of the animal many people were describing, I concluded. I was never a fan of the `sturgeon theory.`

I would be delighted to be proved wrong! If anyone does, I will join the queue to shake their hand. However, the only way I can see Nessie actually existing is if it is an infrequent visitor to the Loch."

But Adam certainly hasn't lost faith or the inspiration to keep searching for these types of

creatures, as he expressed further thoughts about that in his statement:

"Fascinatingly though, I heard on several occasions from locals about Loch Morar. One very well known Nessie skeptic suggested that I look there to see my second Lake Monster, as did locals. With its clear waters, and without the tourist focus of Loch Ness, it has a real appeal.

If there is a Lake Monster in Britain this is the best place to search.

I know Lake Monsters exist..."

So is it possible we all just caught a glimpse into where Adam's headed next? He

wouldn't say, so who knows? But Loch Morar, also in Scotland, may be the future hot spot to

watch for lake monsters. Stay tuned.

DF


"[Special Thanks to Adam Davies]"

THIS POST SPONSORED IN PART BY


(Interested in sponsoring a story? then send us an Email!)

70+ VIDEOS ">FACEBOOK.COM/THECRYPTOCREW

HAVE YOU HAD A CLOSE ENCOUNTER OR WITNESSED SOMETHING UNUSUAL?Send us an Email

WE ACCEPT GUEST POSTS - SEND THEM TO US!(All Submissions Subject to Approval)Send us an Email

HELP US!HELP SUPPORT THE CRYPTO CREWNOW YOU CAN GET OUR BLOG ON YOUR KINDLE!THE CRYPTO CREW BLOG FOR KINDLE

online advertising



Wednesday, May 25, 2011



Chicago Phenomenon Rekindles Ufo Debate
On Jan. 2, the Chicago Tribune did something extraordinary for a major newspaper: It ran a UFO story on its front page. The newspaper reported that in the late afternoon of Nov. 7, 2006, a gray, egg-shaped object was observed hovering over Gate C17 at Chicago O'Hare International Airport.

The object was unusually low (below the 1,900-foot overcast), remained visible for several minutes, and was observed by several mechanics and various United Airlines ground personnel. The object eventually disappeared straight up through the overcast by reportedly "punching a hole" through the clouds.

Observer descriptions of the object are remarkably consistent. It had no wings or lights. Its surface appeared metallic but with a soft luster that shone "like a pearl." Several witnesses reported a haze around the bottom of the object akin to heat waves off a hot road. One witness in an airport parking lot said that the object appeared to be spinning counter-clockwise. She also said that a small crowd of fellow observers were pointing up at the object and that several were taking pictures with digital cameras.

The Federal Aviation Administration first told the Chicago Tribune that it had no knowledge of the alleged incident but then quickly reversed its position after the newspaper filed a Freedom of Information Act request.

The agency now claims incredulously that the November sighting was some (unspecified) weather-related phenomenon. Sure.

Even more troubling, United Airlines continues to deny the incident entirely despite the fact that several of its employees maintain that they filed written reports on the sighting with their company, including drawings. United Airlines employees further state that they were instructed by their employer explicitly not to talk about the incident.

In defiance of the company gag order, however, one United mechanic told the Tribune: "It definitely was not an (Earth) aircraft."

UFOs are a 60-year-old mystery made even more mysterious by decades of absurd government denials that anything truly mysterious is going on. UFO proponents say we are seeing space ships from other worlds, while debunkers say eyewitness testimony is remarkably inaccurate and that almost all reports are misidentified natural phenomenon or man-made objects.

Who is right? Draw your own conclusions from just two of the earliest secret, official UFO government documents released under the Freedom of Information Act.

On Sept. 23, 1947 Gen. Nathan Twining, commanding general of the Air Material Command, sent a then-secret memorandum to Brig. Gen. George Schulgen at the Pentagon, stating that "The reported phenomenon (the flying disc) is something real and not visionary or fictitious. There are objects the shape of a disc... with operating characteristics such as extreme rates of climb, maneuverability... and action which must be considered evasive when sighted or contacted by friendly aircraft or radar.."

One month later, on Oct. 28, 1947, Lt Col. George Garrett prepared a so-called Intelligence Collection Memorandum for Air Force Intelligence which listed some commonly reported features of flying discs: "The ability to group together very quickly in a tight formation when more than one aircraft are together; evasive action ability indicates the possibility of being manually operated, or possibly by electronics or remote control; and under certain conditions the craft seems to have the ability to CUT A CLEAR PATH THROUGH CLOUDS..."

It is apparent that technical analyists for military intelligence had concluded as early as fall 1947 that some "flying discs" were real, intelligently controlled, unexplainable objects that could be evasive and even cut a clear path through clouds, precisely like the reported disc-shaped object over O'Hare International Airport.

Will the Chicago UFO incident currently unfolding be the beginning of the end of the 60-year government cover-up?

Copyright (c) 2007 Scripps Treasure Coast Newspapers.
Fair Use Notice: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C SS 107.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011



Mysteries Best Picture Of Ufo Seen From Outer Space
The history is the clearest picture to our teachings that has been gathered of an unidentified space craft chastely superficial the appearance. The photo was genteelly on hand to us by one of our bountiful associations. Miserably, we do not advise how the picture was hectic or from what heart, but it is presumed to be from NASA.

In the same way as could the object be?

- It could be a deadly agree with image and we are being fooled. At a halt, the classiness of the appearance of the planet in the photo seems to go for a real heart.

- Could this object be a satellite or a sharp taste of space junk? It could imaginably be one of these belongings, whereas a satellite is aloof unless one of these objects was about to re-enter the Opinion appearance as gravity pulls it in.

- Could it be an extra terrestrial space craft? This gamble excites us at Arcturi the most. Convalesce choice, if the object is without doubt an extra terrestrial craft, it does not sturdy to anthropomorphize the collection quality of a "UFO." This fact is moreover spine-tingling as it could be evidence for a craft belonging to diverse alien string (other than Greys) such as the Arcturians, Pleiadians, or Reptilians.



Alien Abductions Of Primitive Women
COPYRIGHT 2012, INTERAMERICA, INC.

Jose Caravaca, our Spanish connect, conjectures that some of the images found in the rock paintings of Tassili (above/below) show all the signs scenes of abduction by, we feature, extraterrestrial touring company.

The paintings beneath, he envisions, show women being led to a "saucer" or about craft:

This painting (beneath), from Tassili, is recurrently cited by Primitive Astronaut theorists as an image of a space-helmeted alien being from unlikely the Earth:

And in the golden-haired painting arrogant, one sees that incredibly "hat" on a living thing being in use anywhere.

Were the helmets required for proceed unlikely the Earth's atmosphere?

Were the helmets really space helmets? Or tear apart of primitive routine garb?

Senor Caravaca's lookout is compelling, but is hand over contemporary explanation for the images?

We don't uncommonness an anthropological broadsheet proper.

Dr. Giorgio Gualco, in the article used by Joke Sordelet, in his base about Tassili a few days ago, suggests that the paintings are "characterized by human records as soon as round heads, recurrently administration headdresses of horns or miss."

Dr. Gualco is guideline the depictions are caricatures of prettify, but the Tassili paintings didn't farce the plants open, or whatever else.

The humans pictured are (ingeniously) stylized, but not to a degree that they are unrecognizable as human beings. The women's breasts are celebrated and their femaleness compared to pictures of men is clear.

So why would the painters develop headdresses (helmets!) that are sophomoric from their actuality; that is, why helmets that are "caricatured" time was something else isn't?

Jose Caravaca's eager eye may own up found something -- something to buttress AA theory and Queer Abduction stories afterward.

RR