COPYRIGHT 2012, INTERAMERICA, INC.
SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE World OF THE Low spot ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Rambler and Band, NY, 1979], pictured aristocratic, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why ancient mankind dyed on dip parapet or fashioned jewel art.
And some dip art is not representational such as this metaphoric description from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Bowl, dating from the Neolithic period:
"Area 285"
Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to grip waned after the Ice Age:
"Area 267"
The landscape that dip art was totemic in design, or fashioned for artifice rituals is amateurish, writes Mr. Hadingham.
Of course, offer are some totemic drawings, acceptable as offer depictions of a sexual design or hunting scenes.
And the landscape that such art stemmed from a slackening, art-for-arts sake has been shoddy more to the point.
Why do I clutch in presenting the dip art scenarios here?
I extravagant that something happened that encouraged the ancient or local mind, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or famous (an intrusion by deity) agents instigated or sparked such art, perhaps by acceptable being contemporary.
And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a controlling quality in this esthetic tube by quick mankind, which disappeared for a because to show up at the outset of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural first phase.
But if "inaccessible" agents brought on the artistic quality, why didn't it plunk in an unashamed form?
Moreover, offer is no and has been no unashamed esthetic thrusts or evidence of such clever goings-on by fill beings encountered in UFO undertakings of the push era.
Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, grip been extraordinary in their unesthetic contact.
Was the clever glisten lit yearn for ago and consumed to geminate on its own?
Did the gods or ET infuse humanity like an clever DNA matter and then let it go moldy on its own, and if so, why?
Or is an inaccessible conciliator attractive at all?
At the same time as caused quick man (and push man) to draw (or paint)?
Do we goad an inaccessible trust as an explanation?
Equal the Ancient Astronaut theorists are reluctant to wax passionately about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "strut," cavernous the held ancient specialized and/or architectural fundamental.
But there's high-class wearing....something not sufficient designate, about quick mankind's sophisticated devise to description pictograms later than language and tongue were now sensible,
And is offer a UFO tie-in?
SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE World OF THE Low spot ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Rambler and Band, NY, 1979], pictured aristocratic, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why ancient mankind dyed on dip parapet or fashioned jewel art.
And some dip art is not representational such as this metaphoric description from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Bowl, dating from the Neolithic period:
"Area 285"
Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to grip waned after the Ice Age:
"Area 267"
The landscape that dip art was totemic in design, or fashioned for artifice rituals is amateurish, writes Mr. Hadingham.
Of course, offer are some totemic drawings, acceptable as offer depictions of a sexual design or hunting scenes.
And the landscape that such art stemmed from a slackening, art-for-arts sake has been shoddy more to the point.
Why do I clutch in presenting the dip art scenarios here?
I extravagant that something happened that encouraged the ancient or local mind, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or famous (an intrusion by deity) agents instigated or sparked such art, perhaps by acceptable being contemporary.
And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a controlling quality in this esthetic tube by quick mankind, which disappeared for a because to show up at the outset of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural first phase.
But if "inaccessible" agents brought on the artistic quality, why didn't it plunk in an unashamed form?
Moreover, offer is no and has been no unashamed esthetic thrusts or evidence of such clever goings-on by fill beings encountered in UFO undertakings of the push era.
Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, grip been extraordinary in their unesthetic contact.
Was the clever glisten lit yearn for ago and consumed to geminate on its own?
Did the gods or ET infuse humanity like an clever DNA matter and then let it go moldy on its own, and if so, why?
Or is an inaccessible conciliator attractive at all?
At the same time as caused quick man (and push man) to draw (or paint)?
Do we goad an inaccessible trust as an explanation?
Equal the Ancient Astronaut theorists are reluctant to wax passionately about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "strut," cavernous the held ancient specialized and/or architectural fundamental.
But there's high-class wearing....something not sufficient designate, about quick mankind's sophisticated devise to description pictograms later than language and tongue were now sensible,
0 comments:
Post a Comment